IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Worker Absenteeism: An Analysis Using Microdata


  • Barmby, Tim
  • Orme, Chris D
  • Treble, John


This paper presents preliminary findings of a study of worker absenteeism. Our main purpose is to identify the various factors that influence the rate of absence for individual workers and to quantify their impact. Candidates for inclusion are measurable factors relating either to the structure of the terms and conditions of work (including the sick-pay scheme and disciplinary system); or personal characteristics of the workers themselves. The firm studied operates an experience-rated sick-pay scheme and the results reported in the paper concentrate on the analysis of a data set constructed from their payroll and attendance records. Under the scheme, workers' entitlement to sick pay in the current calendar year is determined by their record of absence over the previous two years. This is achieved by assigning the workers to three groups: good attenders (A), average attenders (B) and poor attenders (C). A worker's group is determined by the number of absence `points' accumulated during the previous two years. Points are given for any absence that is not deemed acceptable. (Acceptable absences are mostly medically certified.) We find that for the most part, the firm's sick-pay scheme works most effectively on the duration of absence, and not its incidence. The incidence of absence appears to be determined mostly by personal characteristics (especially sex and marital status). We interpret this to mean that workers do not consider their entitlement to sick pay when commencing an absence, but that they do consider it when deciding to return to work.

Suggested Citation

  • Barmby, Tim & Orme, Chris D & Treble, John, 1990. "Worker Absenteeism: An Analysis Using Microdata," CEPR Discussion Papers 434, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:434

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.