How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be?
We explore the trade-off between a patent's length (its lifetime) and its width (its scope of coverage). A wider patent generally reduces the distortion of consumers' choices between the patented brand of the product and unpatented, lower-priced varieties sold by competitors, it also permits higher prices, and so increases (relative to profits) the deadweight losses from consumers switching consumption out of the product class. We establish conditions under which infinitely-lived but very narrowly-focused patents are the socially efficient way to reward innovation, and also show when very short-lived but very broad patents are optimal.
|Date of creation:||Mar 1990|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ.|
Phone: 44 - 20 - 7183 8801
Fax: 44 - 20 - 7183 8820
|Order Information:|| Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.