IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21968.html

Innovation Uncertainty Shapes Divergent Pathways Toward Decarbonization

Author

Listed:
  • Moers, Theo
  • Fioriti, Davide
  • Wagner, Gernot

Abstract

Clean-energy technologies are getting better and cheaper, but just how much is uncertain. Falling costs for solar, wind, and batteries have repeatedly changed expectations for the power-sector transition. Yet most models still use exogenous cost scenarios or fixed learning curves, limiting feedbacks among deployment, innovation, and system design. We here examine how modeled innovation uncertainty is linked to clean-energy deployment pathways with no pre-defined carbon constraints or price. By coupling empirically validated stochastic learning processes for solar, wind, and batteries to a recursive global energy-system model, we trace how uncertain future costs and deployment feedbacks shape power-system pathways. The median 2050 system reaches ≥75% renewable electricity (10–90% range: ∼67–82%), with a median fossil electricity share of ≤20% (∼13–27%). Yet specific pathways and cumulative emissions vary widely. Pathways with earlier clean deployment lower emissions at little energy-system-cost premium, suggesting that policy evaluation should go well beyond expected costs and instead focus on early investment and transition pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Moers, Theo & Fioriti, Davide & Wagner, Gernot, 2026. "Innovation Uncertainty Shapes Divergent Pathways Toward Decarbonization," CEPR Discussion Papers 21968, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21968
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q47 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy Forecasting
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.