IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21892.html

Democratizing Private Markets: Equilibrium Predictions

Author

Listed:
  • Pástor, LuboÅ¡
  • Stambaugh, Robert F.
  • Taylor, Lucian

Abstract

We study how opening private markets to retail investors affects investors and firms. Calibrating a production-based asset-pricing model, we find that democratization raises retail investors' welfare, but barely. Retail investors benefit little from democratization even if they face no extra cost or other disadvantage relative to institutional investors. The private market is simply too small for improved risk sharing to matter much. Whether or not private-market retail investing is costly, democratization substantially reshapes private firms' ownership and materially reduces their cost of capital, leading them to grow. Private equity earns a positive CAPM alpha, which shrinks after democratization.

Suggested Citation

  • Pástor, LuboÅ¡ & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian, 2026. "Democratizing Private Markets: Equilibrium Predictions," CEPR Discussion Papers 21892, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21892
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.