IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21887.html

Subjective Expectations of Husbands and Wives and Couples’ Decision-Making Under Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • de Paula, Aureo
  • Valente, Christine

Abstract

Many decisions are taken jointly by multiple individuals. When outcomes are uncertain, decision-makers may have different subjective expectations (“beliefs†) about the consequences of different choices. We develop a tractable empirical framework for identifying the relative influence of joint decision-makers’ beliefs without assuming Pareto optimality when beliefs differ. We apply the framework to contraceptive choices in Nigeria, examining the relative weight couples place on wives’ versus husbands’ beliefs. We find that spouses have different subjective expectations, and that the weight placed on each spouse’s beliefs varies across domains. Therefore, the optimal targeting of information interventions to husbands or wives is domain-dependent.

Suggested Citation

  • de Paula, Aureo & Valente, Christine, 2026. "Subjective Expectations of Husbands and Wives and Couples’ Decision-Making Under Uncertainty," CEPR Discussion Papers 21887, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21887
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D10 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - General
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.