IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21806.html

Chaste Widowhood

Author

Listed:
  • Xue, Melanie Meng

Abstract

Why did chaste widowhood become so prominent in late imperial China? Existing explanations emphasize Confucian moral discourse, lineage honor, state recognition, and concerns over female chastity. I examine whether population growth contributed to the formation and strengthening of cultural expectations that attached moral value to widow non-remarriage. By making non-remarriage publicly valuable, chaste widowhood could restrict widows' return to fertility-bearing unions, a post-marital margin of China's preventive checks. I combine two newly assembled datasets: nationwide Chinese genealogy microdata and chaste-woman cases from the Ming Shilu. In prefecture-by-period fixed-effects panels, a larger local male population is associated with more chaste-woman cases. In the 50-year panel, a doubling of the population measure is associated with about 8 percent more cases. The relationship remains positive after accounting for genealogy coverage and composition, observed widowhood events, and local recognition capacity. It is not stronger in places with greater state reach. The evidence suggests that population growth contributed to the development and growing force of cultural expectations surrounding widow non-remarriage.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue, Melanie Meng, 2026. "Chaste Widowhood," CEPR Discussion Papers 21806, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21806
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J12 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • N35 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Asia including Middle East
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.