IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21798.html

Tariff Incidence and Market Power: Evidence from the 2025 US Tariff Shock

Author

Listed:
  • Freund, Caroline

Abstract

Using monthly bilateral trade data for 50 countries at the HTS-10 product level, this paper finds that foreign exporters absorbed 40-50 percent of the tariff increases, consistent with optimal tariff theory. Absorption was highly unequal: dominant exporters absorbed 50–65 percent of the tariff shock through lower export prices, while smaller suppliers passed through most or all of the tariff. The results differ from previous studies finding near-complete pass-through for the 2025 tariff shock because of asymmetrical treatment of suppliers. Other studies evaluate whether the typical trade partner absorbed tariffs—it did not. But given trade is highly skewed, with the top exporting country in a product accounting for nearly 50 percent of trade on average, and the top 1 percent of products accounting for over 50 percent of trade, the focus here is on aggregate effects. Provided the largest suppliers are absorbing tariffs, consumer prices will rise by less. The results are robust to a wide range of controls.

Suggested Citation

  • Freund, Caroline, 2026. "Tariff Incidence and Market Power: Evidence from the 2025 US Tariff Shock," CEPR Discussion Papers 21798, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21798
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.