IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21769.html

Measuring the Culture of Useful Knowledge and the Roots of Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Klemp, Marc

Abstract

I develop a method that uses the language surrounding places, people, and other entities in dated text to measure their attributes over time, and use it to ask whether a local orientation toward useful knowledge predicts innovation and growth. Patterns of word use form a numerical map, or word embedding, in which fixed word lists define attribute scales for scoring each entity. Neither scales nor scores use outcomes, and publication dates restrict scores to prior text. Applied to 38.6 billion context-word occurrences in nearly 2.7 million English-language works from 1500-1899, the method recovers independently measured elevation and agricultural dependence and combines learning, science, practical improvement, and print in a useful-knowledge index. Within countries, a one-standard-deviation increase in the index is associated with 0.105 standard deviations higher log(1+patents) during 1980-2014 and a 3.4 percentage-point increase in the probability of any patent. The association remains 0.062 standard deviations in 7,011 cells without a recorded birthplace of a notable intellectual. An index reconstructed from pre-1750 contexts predicts 1980-2014 log patenting within countries at 0.053 standard deviations after controlling for textual coverage, with positive estimates in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Training the embedding solely on pre-1750 text leaves the full-sample association positive. Within countries, the 1500-1899 index also predicts average nighttime light over 1992-2024 and regional GDP per capita in each region's latest available year, 2016-2020. In European cities, the pre-1750 index predicts faster post-1750 growth near coal, a complementarity concentrated in Britain. The findings support Mokyr's view of useful knowledge as a local innovative capacity and an Allen-Mokyr synthesis for Britain's coal-and-steam take-off.

Suggested Citation

  • Klemp, Marc, 2026. "Measuring the Culture of Useful Knowledge and the Roots of Innovation," CEPR Discussion Papers 21769, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21769
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N33 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Europe: Pre-1913
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.