IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21738.html

Household Responses to Phantom Riches

Author

Listed:
  • Knüpfer, Samuli
  • Rantala, Ville
  • Vihriälä, Erkki
  • Vokata, Petra

Abstract

We study the consequences of investment fraud victimization using unique administrative data on Ponzi scheme investors. A matched control event-study design shows that the victims experience a six percent annual labor income loss. Income first declines when an investor joins the scheme, consistent with distorted beliefs lowering labor supply. The scheme’s collapse triggers a further decrease, which we attribute to financial stress. Investors also face higher indebtedness and tilt their portfolios away from delegated investments. The income loss persists in the long run, equals twice the direct investment loss, and substantially adds to the social cost of fraud.

Suggested Citation

  • Knüpfer, Samuli & Rantala, Ville & Vihriälä, Erkki & Vokata, Petra, 2026. "Household Responses to Phantom Riches," CEPR Discussion Papers 21738, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21738
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General
    • G51 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Household Savings, Borrowing, Debt, and Wealth
    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.