IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21729.html

Bank Runs, Lender of Last Resort, and Liquidity Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Ahnert, Toni
  • Anand, Kartik
  • Ordonez-Calafi, Guillem

Abstract

We study the liquidity choice of a bank subject to rollover risk and support from a lender of last resort (LLR) and study the consequences for bank stability, funding costs, and liquidity regulation. The liquidity choice balances forgoing profitable yet illiquid investment with fewer panic runs and cheaper debt. A higher LLR penalty rate increases bank liquidity and has a V-shaped effect on ex-ante bank stability. Turning to normative implications, the availability of the LLR reduces welfare for a large social cost of bank failure. The anticipation of ex-post support mitigates panic runs but induces lower bank liquidity ex ante, which increases funding costs and the frequency of bank failure. Liquidity regulation aligns private with social incentives and increases the social value of LLR support.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahnert, Toni & Anand, Kartik & Ordonez-Calafi, Guillem, 2026. "Bank Runs, Lender of Last Resort, and Liquidity Regulation," CEPR Discussion Papers 21729, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21729
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.