IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21661.html

How do ransomware groups choose their targets? An empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Moore, Tyler
  • Gandal, Neil
  • Kashchuk, Dmytro

Abstract

Ransomware groups vary in the types of organizations they compromise, yet little empirical work has examined whether these differences extend to the technology stacks of victims. We analyze 5,190 ransomware incidents across 151 groups, linking each victim to its observed technology stack from the SWDB Company Intelligence database. We find that some enterprise software is associated with greater ransomware risk than others, and that this association is often stronger for technologies carrying more known vulnerabilities. Next, by analyzing leaked chat logs of leading ransomware groups, we present direct evidence that some groups choose their victims based on observed technology use and revenue data gathered through opensource intelligence. Finally, examining the full population of victims, we find that some groups concentrate on particular technologies and revenue profiles, while others appear more opportunistic, with a victim profile close to the overall population.

Suggested Citation

  • Moore, Tyler & Gandal, Neil & Kashchuk, Dmytro, 2026. "How do ransomware groups choose their targets? An empirical analysis," CEPR Discussion Papers 21661, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21661
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D00 - Microeconomics - - General - - - General
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.