IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21438.html

Tracing Sanctions through the Value Chain: Evidence from the US Cotton Ban

Author

Listed:
  • Maystadt, Jean-Francois
  • Tsang, Kampui
  • Van Biesebroeck, Johannes

Abstract

We investigate to what extent and in what way the US Cotton Ban on products originating from Xinjiang province affected Chinese exports. We find that direct exports of cotton and cotton products to the United States fell by 19% at the intensive margin and 4% at the extensive margin. While the import reduction is strongest for Chinese provinces sourcing most actively from Xinjiang, reductions in US imports from third countries correlate only very weakly with the extent to which countries source cotton inputs from China. The European Union did not impose sanctions, but its cottonrelated imports from China declined significantly as well. Our analysis demonstrates that this negative spillover effect is not due to lower prices, nor to EU countries indirectly facing the ban as they want to maintain access to the US market. The most likely reason for the import decline is European firms’ concerns about reputational damage associated with using cotton products sourced from China.

Suggested Citation

  • Maystadt, Jean-Francois & Tsang, Kampui & Van Biesebroeck, Johannes, 2026. "Tracing Sanctions through the Value Chain: Evidence from the US Cotton Ban," CEPR Discussion Papers 21438, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21438
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.