IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21426.html

Inflexibility and the Stalled Progress of American Women in the Labor Market

Author

Listed:
  • Albanesi, Stefania

Abstract

Care responsibilities constrain women's labor supply, particularly when labor markets lack flexibility. This chapter examines how workplace inflexibility has shaped women's employment in the United States. I document two sources of inflexibility that contributed to the stagnation of women's labor force participation since the 1990s: changes in the earnings structure that penalize reduced work hours, and the absence of supportive family policies. The COVID-19 pandemic provides a natural experiment to assess the importance of flexibility. I show that the widespread adoption of remote work relaxed flexibility constraints, and employment growth during 2019–2023 was strongly associated with occupational flexibility for both men and women. However, as return-to-office mandates intensified after 2023, inflexibility became a significant predictor of employment declines only for women. This gender-specific pattern is consistent with women's greater care responsibilities and suggests that the availability of flexible work arrangements is a key determinant of their labor market outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Albanesi, Stefania, 2026. "Inflexibility and the Stalled Progress of American Women in the Labor Market," CEPR Discussion Papers 21426, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21426
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.