IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21405.html

Who Bears the Costs of Technology Sanctions? Evidence from Global Smartphone Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Elsas-Nicolle, Ambre
  • Li, Shiyuan
  • Verboven, Frank

Abstract

U.S.--China trade tensions have led to sanctions on major Chinese firms, with potential spillovers to third-country markets. We study the effects of U.S. restrictions on Huawei's access to key U.S. technologies in smartphone markets in the United States and Europe. Using product-level data, we show that the sanctions substantially reduced Huawei's sales and prices, consistent with a negative demand shock. To quantify equilibrium effects, we develop a differentiated-products oligopoly model in which the sanctions degrade two key Huawei product attributes: access to Google Mobile Services and 5G chipsets. We find that the sanctions were effective in reducing Huawei's profits, despite its divestiture of Honor to mitigate losses. While U.S. consumers are largely unaffected, European consumers experience considerable welfare losses. These findings indicate that firm-targeted sanctions can shift welfare losses away from the sanctioning country and onto third-country consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Elsas-Nicolle, Ambre & Li, Shiyuan & Verboven, Frank, 2026. "Who Bears the Costs of Technology Sanctions? Evidence from Global Smartphone Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 21405, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21405
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.