IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21374.html

Rounding Up: Complexity, Satisficing, and Bias in Inflation Expectations

Author

Listed:
  • McMahon, Michael
  • Petersen, Luba
  • Rholes, Ryan

Abstract

Using over 17,000 incentivized inflation forecasts, we provide causal evidence that environmental complexity and subjective complexity are distinct drivers of rounding in survey responses. Experimental variation in shock volatility and central-bank communication regimes shows that both channels raise forecast uncertainty and the propensity to round, with subjective complexity the dominant force — explaining 58–86% of rounding depending on horizon and specification. Survey of Consumer Expectations microdata corroborate these findings: rounding declines with survey tenure, rises with inflation volatility, and inflates measured inflation expectations by nearly 7 percentage points among inexperienced respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • McMahon, Michael & Petersen, Luba & Rholes, Ryan, 2026. "Rounding Up: Complexity, Satisficing, and Bias in Inflation Expectations," CEPR Discussion Papers 21374, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21374
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations
    • E52 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Monetary Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.