IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21266.html

Religion and Conflict: Evidence from China, 1860–1911

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Yujing
  • Ma, Chicheng
  • Valencia Caicedo, Felipe

Abstract

This paper examines the economic origins and consequences of anti-missionary violence during the late Qing China (1860–1911). Using newly digitized data, we find that conflicts were attenuated by economic complementarities — such as access to Treaty Ports and public goods — rather than triggered by religious competition with Confucian elites. On the consequences part, we document negative economic spillovers of anti-missionary conflicts, through reduced foreign and domestic investments in modern firms and banks. These negative outcomes were reinforced by Western media coverage and persist today through lower FDI flows and increased autarkic attitudes among residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Yujing & Ma, Chicheng & Valencia Caicedo, Felipe, 2026. "Religion and Conflict: Evidence from China, 1860–1911," CEPR Discussion Papers 21266, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21266
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion
    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • N35 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Asia including Middle East
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.