IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/21126.html

The Liquidity Coverage Ratio a Decade On: A Stocktake of the Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Doerr, Sebastian
  • Drehmann, Mathias

Abstract

In the decade since the implementation of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), what have we learned about its design, effectiveness, and impact? The LCR is a central pillar of the Basel III regulatory reforms and aims to ensure that banks hold sufficient high-quality liquid assets to withstand short-term funding stress. Theoretical work, which mostly features fire-sale externalities, concludes that the LCR can raise welfare by mandating banks to hold more liquid assets or rely less on fragile short-term funding. Empirical work suggests that the LCR strongly raises banks' high-quality liquid assets and somewhat reduces their reliance on short-term funding. However, it can crowd out lending and induce greater risk-taking. The survey concludes with a discussion of open questions about the LCR's calibration, consequences, and interaction with central bank policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Doerr, Sebastian & Drehmann, Mathias, 2026. "The Liquidity Coverage Ratio a Decade On: A Stocktake of the Literature," CEPR Discussion Papers 21126, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP21126
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:21126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.