IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20893.html

Risk Sharing and Incentives: Public Insurance Versus Bankruptcy Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Andersen, Torben M
  • Bhattacharya, Joydeep
  • Wang, Min

Abstract

This study compares public social insurance and consumer bankruptcy in a life-cycle model. Without moral hazard, public insurance dominates by providing superior consumption smoothing. However, with moral hazard, bankruptcy protection becomes optimal. Its exemption levels, priced into competitive credit contracts, internalize incentive distortions and can Pareto dominate public insurance. The two policies are strategic substitutes, offering little added benefit when combined. The key trade-off is between public insurance's better risk-sharing and bankruptcy's superior management of incentive problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Andersen, Torben M & Bhattacharya, Joydeep & Wang, Min, 2025. "Risk Sharing and Incentives: Public Insurance Versus Bankruptcy Protection," CEPR Discussion Papers 20893, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20893
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.