IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20863.html

Should We Stop the COPs?

Author

Listed:
  • Bourlés, Renaud
  • Laurent-Lucchetti, Jérémy
  • Rochet, Jean-Charles

Abstract

Ten years after COP21, carbon emission trajectories remain far above the 1.5 ° C threshold, due to lack of international consensus. Breaking from cost-benefit approaches, we assess the maximum reduction in carbon emissions that could be accepted by all countries. We characterize the consistent target mechanism that minimizes global emissions subject to the participation constraint of each country. The mechanism can be implemented either via a uniform carbon tax or as a cap–and–trade system. Calibrated to data from 69 countries, including GDP, carbon intensities, and observed tax rates, our model suggests – for our baseline scenario – that a uniform carbon price of $250 per ton would be politically acceptable by all countries. It could reduce global emissions by 35%, but would require unprecedented international transfers: up to 3% of world GDP, with a large redistribution from high-income, low-emission countries to carbon-intensive emerging economies. Our analysis highlights the structural ambition gap imposed by voluntary cooperation and identifies two levers to overcome it: convergence in green technologies and stronger political support for mitigation. Without progress in these dimensions, international climate policy remains constrained to deliver only modest results.

Suggested Citation

  • Bourlés, Renaud & Laurent-Lucchetti, Jérémy & Rochet, Jean-Charles, 2025. "Should We Stop the COPs?," CEPR Discussion Papers 20863, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20863
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.