IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20711.html

Multiproduct Firms, Refunds and Product Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Ertner, Sebastian
  • Janssen, Maarten

Abstract

Many e-commerce retailers adopt strategies that induce consumers to order multiple products at once, inspect their fit at home, and then decide which products to return. These policies introduce a trade-off as they result in consumers acquiring products that better fit their taste, at the expense of the private and social costs associated with products being returned. We determine the conditions under which retailers find it optimal to induce consumers to inspect products simultaneously or sequentially. We also analyze the efficiency properties of market outcomes and state conditions under which inducing simultaneous inspection (surprisingly) leads to fewer returns. An important part of the analysis characterizes the optimal alternative pricing policy that induces consumers to sequentially inspect products after ordering and finds that partial refunds facilitate the extraction of surplus from consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ertner, Sebastian & Janssen, Maarten, 2025. "Multiproduct Firms, Refunds and Product Returns," CEPR Discussion Papers 20711, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20711
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - General
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.