IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20681.html

Ex Machina: Financial Stability in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Anand, Kartik
  • Kazinnik, Sophia
  • Leonello, Agnese
  • Panetti, Ettore

Abstract

We study financial decision making by reinforcement learning algorithms and large language models (LLMs) in a mutual fund redemption model with strategic complementarities and multiple equilibria. Both depart from the efficient equilibrium and trigger financial fragility, but through distinct mechanisms. Reinforcement learning (Q-learning) algorithms redeem excessively because of a learning bias, which we characterize formally and show can produce non-Nash equilibrium outcomes. LLMs fail to coordinate because they hold different beliefs about others' decisions, which we derive from their chain-of-thought reasoning. Our results show that the design of AI agents can shape collective outcomes and, ultimately, financial stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Anand, Kartik & Kazinnik, Sophia & Leonello, Agnese & Panetti, Ettore, 2025. "Ex Machina: Financial Stability in the Age of Artificial Intelligence," CEPR Discussion Papers 20681, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20681
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.