IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20623.html

Public Good Provision and Group Size: Elevator Retrofits

Author

Listed:
  • Asplund, Björn Marcus
  • Genesove, David

Abstract

We examine how group size affects the probability of provision of a discrete public good when all group members must agree to its provision and the manner of its funding. We derive empirically testable predictions to distinguish between models where provision depends on aggregate valuations, as in the first best and second best, and where provision depends on the minimum valuation, as might arise from social norms or strategic simplicity concerns. Our empirical application is to the presence of retrofitted elevators in old condominium buildings in Copenhagen, Denmark. Contrary to the prediction from the preference aggregating models, we find retrofitted elevators to be less common in buildings with many apartments. The rate of decline is consistent with fixed sharing models.

Suggested Citation

  • Asplund, Björn Marcus & Genesove, David, 2025. "Public Good Provision and Group Size: Elevator Retrofits," CEPR Discussion Papers 20623, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20623
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.