IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20567.html

Bitcoin Arbitrage: The Role of a Single Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Flowerday, Ethan
  • Gandal, Neil
  • Halaburda, Hanna
  • Olson, Eric
  • Ardel, Gabriela

Abstract

This paper examines arbitrage in Bitcoin markets and the role of a single exchange, Bitfinex, in shaping market inefficiencies. Using tick-level data from four major centralized exchanges between 2017-2020, we find that nearly 80\% of arbitrage opportunities were concentrated on Bitfinex, where Bitcoin traded at a sustained premium. Removing Bitfinex from the system cuts the frequency and size of spreads, lowers the volatility–arbitrage correlation from 0.86 to 0.59, and shortens median lifetime from 11 to 4 minutes. Event studies trace the mispricing to fiat liquidity constraints and regulatory frictions specific to Bitfinex. The findings extend limits of arbitrage theory to digital assets, showing how venue level constraints propagate system wide inefficiency and suggest that secure fiat routs, rather than faster trading speed alone, are crucial for cryptocurrency price convergence. This challenges the assumption that arbitrage alone is sufficient to eliminate price discrepancies in digital asset markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Flowerday, Ethan & Gandal, Neil & Halaburda, Hanna & Olson, Eric & Ardel, Gabriela, 2025. "Bitcoin Arbitrage: The Role of a Single Exchange," CEPR Discussion Papers 20567, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20567
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.