IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20553.html

Shifting Preferences. Prices for den Oude and den Helschen Breughel during the Long Eighteenth century

Author

Listed:
  • Radermecker, Anne-Sophie
  • Oosterlinck, Kim

Abstract

The art market is a useful indicator to examine shifts in preferences but still remains underexploited in art historical studies. By exploring the reception of Pieter Brueghel’s pictures, father and son, on the 18th and early 19th century art market, this paper empirically questions the market reception of a family affair, after it fell into oblivion for more than two centuries. The prices of works by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and Pieter Brueghel the Younger, sold between 1700 and 1840, were collected to create two price indices. These indices reveal that the demand for Breughelian pictures was particularly low during this period of disgrace. Several characteristics of pictures by Pieter I and Pieter II were nonetheless still attractive for buyers at the time. Prototypical scenes, the length of the catalogue notes, and the inclusion of quality labels in the note were likely to affect prices. Quality labels, in particular, were used as marketing tools to highlight the peculiarities of some lots and create product differentiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Radermecker, Anne-Sophie & Oosterlinck, Kim, 2025. "Shifting Preferences. Prices for den Oude and den Helschen Breughel during the Long Eighteenth century," CEPR Discussion Papers 20553, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20553
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.