IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20538.html

Market Access Uncertainty and Trade in Services

Author

Listed:
  • Egger, Peter
  • Francois, Joseph
  • Garcés, Irene
  • Manchin, Miriam

Abstract

We develop an analytical/empirical framework bridging the decision under uncertainty and recent gravity-based empirical trade literature. We examine the impact of policy uncertainty on services trade, focusing on binding overhang, the gap between market access commitments and actual applied policy). The government’s ability to change policies within this gap yields uncertainty for firms regarding market access. Our findings reveal average Most Favored Nation (MFN) services trade costs ranging from 12.38% for low or medium-income countries to 14.08% for high-income countries, comparable to other regulatory trade barriers. We embed our estimates in a general equilibrium model to quantify the effects of removing market-access uncertainty in services. Results show substantive economic effects on trade and overall economic performance. Globally, we estimate a 0.72% increase in real GDP and a 12.65% increase in services trade volumes from removal of binding overhang. This fits into the range of estimates for deep multilateral and preferential trade liberalization for goods.

Suggested Citation

  • Egger, Peter & Francois, Joseph & Garcés, Irene & Manchin, Miriam, 2025. "Market Access Uncertainty and Trade in Services," CEPR Discussion Papers 20538, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20538
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F17 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Forecasting and Simulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.