IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20534.html

Regulatory Arbitrage in the Market for Player Rights: Evidence from European Soccer

Author

Listed:
  • Ciliberto, Federico
  • Scotti, Davide
  • Vismara, Silvio

Abstract

Firms facing accounting-based regulation can restructure transactions to meet formal constraints without reducing risk. We study this arbitrage in European soccer, where Financial Fair Play (FFP) rewards inflated capital gains from bilateral player exchanges (“cross-transfers†). Using transaction-level data from 20 European leagues (2015–2023), we identify 412 cross-transfers generating €1.37–€2.94 million in excess capital gains per leg, roughly €0.6–1.2 billion in aggregate. The premium is absent before FFP, and gains are positively correlated within pairs, consistent with coordinated inflation rather than liquidity trading. Arbitrage peaks at 8.5% of reported capital gains, declining after regulators adopted transaction-level scrutiny.

Suggested Citation

  • Ciliberto, Federico & Scotti, Davide & Vismara, Silvio, 2025. "Regulatory Arbitrage in the Market for Player Rights: Evidence from European Soccer," CEPR Discussion Papers 20534, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20534
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • Z20 - Other Special Topics - - Sports Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.