IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20533.html

Extrapolation and Rational Inattention: Evidence from Chinese Mutual Funds

Author

Listed:
  • Guarino, Antonio
  • Wang, Gang
  • Yu, Yang

Abstract

Investors and forecasters often extrapolate from past returns, but whether this reflects behavioral bias or efficient information processing remains unclear. We address this question by inferring Chinese mutual fund managers' market expectations from textual analysis of their commentaries and linking them to portfolio choices and performance. Extrapolation is state-dependent: it is stronger when growth is above trend and idiosyncratic risk is relatively more important. It is associated with weaker market timing and stronger stock picking, leaving overall performance unchanged. Our findings support a rational-inattention model of expectation formation, in which managers shift scarce attention between aggregate and stock-specific information as the relative importance of different risks change.

Suggested Citation

  • Guarino, Antonio & Wang, Gang & Yu, Yang, 2025. "Extrapolation and Rational Inattention: Evidence from Chinese Mutual Funds," CEPR Discussion Papers 20533, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20533
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.