IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20391.html

Should Monetary and Fiscal Policy Pull in the Same Direction?

Author

Listed:
  • Bergholt, Drago
  • Røisland, Øistein
  • Sveen, Tommy
  • Torvik, Ragnar

Abstract

There is a common view that if monetary and fiscal policy are to be used together for macroeconomic stabilization, they should pull in the same direction. We challenge this view by analyzing the optimal policy mix in a small open economy. We show that when the economy is hit by inflation shocks or exchange rate shocks, monetary and fiscal policy should pull in opposite directions. This policy mix makes more effective use of the exchange rate channel of monetary policy, allowing inflation to be reduced after a shock with lower costs in terms of unemployment. Only in the case of demand shocks, or if there are significant costs associated with the active use of the interest rate, should monetary and fiscal policy pull in the same direction. We then consider automatic stabilizers. As we show, for demand shocks, automatic stabilizers imply that monetary and fiscal policy pull in the same direction. For inflation and exchange rate shocks, on the other hand, automatic stabilizers imply that the two policy instruments pull in opposite directions. These policy interactions are all consistent with our results on the optimal policy mix. Strong automatic stabilizers could therefore serve as a substitute for optimal discretionary fiscal policy in open economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Bergholt, Drago & Røisland, Øistein & Sveen, Tommy & Torvik, Ragnar, 2025. "Should Monetary and Fiscal Policy Pull in the Same Direction?," CEPR Discussion Papers 20391, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20391
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.