IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20384.html

Firm-Level Nature Dependence

Author

Listed:
  • Garel, Alexandre
  • Romec, Arthur
  • Sautner, Zacharias
  • Wagner, Alexander F.

Abstract

We construct firm-level measures of dependence on ecosystem services (NatureDep scores) for 31,778 listed firms in 117 countries between 2010 and 2023, combining the ENCORE database with firm-level revenue information. NatureDep scores positively correlate with impact on biodiversity, are unrelated to nature-related actions disclosed in the CDP survey, and are not reflected in firms’ corporate disclosures. We employ the measures in three applications. First, NatureDep scores predict BlackRock’s biodiversity-related engagements, indicating perceived financial materiality. Second, the scores are positively associated with measures of downside risk, with effects stemming mostly from high dependencies to water-related ecosystem services. Third, the scores predict nature-related ESG incidents that arise when high nature dependence leads firms to damage nature, overuse resources, or trigger disputes with local communities. Overall, we conclude that investors started to pay attention to nature dependence, while corporate action and disclosure remain limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Garel, Alexandre & Romec, Arthur & Sautner, Zacharias & Wagner, Alexander F., 2025. "Firm-Level Nature Dependence," CEPR Discussion Papers 20384, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20384
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.