IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20319.html

The Effects of Social Movements: Evidence from #MeToo

Author

Listed:
  • Levy, Ro'ee
  • Mattsson, Martin

Abstract

Social movements are associated with large societal changes, but evidence of their causal effects is limited. We study the effect of the MeToo movement on an important personal decision—reporting a sex crime to the police. Victims often do not report sex crimes due to the personal costs involved, but the reporting of sex crimes can have positive externalities and therefore, improve social welfare. Using a difference-in-differences strategy comparing sex crimes and non-sex crimes before and after the MeToo movement started, we find that the movement increased the number of sex crimes reported by approximately 10% and that the effect persisted until the end of our data, 15-27 months after the movement started. The result is confirmed using a triple-difference strategy comparing countries with strong and weak MeToo movements. Using detailed US data, we show that the MeToo movement not only increased reporting but also increased arrests for sexual assaults; and that in contrast to a common criticism of the movement, the effects are similar across racial and socioeconomic groups. Based on additional survey and crime data, we find that the increased reporting reflects a higher propensity to report sex crimes rather than an increase in the incidence of sex crimes. Our results demonstrate that social movements can rapidly and persistently change high-stakes decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Levy, Ro'ee & Mattsson, Martin, 2025. "The Effects of Social Movements: Evidence from #MeToo," CEPR Discussion Papers 20319, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20319
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.