IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20295.html

Lost in Persuasion: Negative Reciprocity in Information Design

Author

Listed:
  • Eliaz, Kfir
  • Eilat, Ran

Abstract

We incorporate negative reciprocity into strategic information transmission, examining how a receiver's response to perceived manipulation influences optimal information design. In one setting, greater signal inaccuracy increases the likelihood that the receiver disregards it; in another, inaccuracy shifts the receiver's preferences unfavorably for the sender. In both cases, the revelation principle fails, yet we characterize the set of posterior beliefs on which an optimal signal is supported. While full revelation may be optimal in one setting, it is never so in the other. Our findings connect information design with behavioral economics, highlighting the implications of design-dependent preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliaz, Kfir & Eilat, Ran, 2025. "Lost in Persuasion: Negative Reciprocity in Information Design," CEPR Discussion Papers 20295, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20295
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.