IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/19652.html

Monopsony in Growth Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Garibaldi, Pietro
  • Turri, Enrico Duilio

Abstract

The secular decline in the labor share and the long-run reduction in labor supply suggest that imperfect labor markets can play a role in long-run economic growth. This paper introduces oligopsony and oligopoly power in a Neoclassical Growth Model with superstar firms. The endogenous markdown of productivity on wages is the key driver of growth misallocation in the asymptotic balanced growth path. The model can be calibrated to simultaneously rationalize the joint trends of GDP growth, declining labor share and hours worked. For the US, the consumption equivalent loss with respect to the optimal growth path is calibrated around 7.5 percent. The theory is also coherent with growing markdown in the US estimated from a simple accounting exercise. An extension of the model with hand-to-mouth workers and capitalists delivers balanced growth with increasing inequality. While - in this context- proportional taxation distorts equilibrium labor supply, a raising minimum wage can restore efficient growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Garibaldi, Pietro & Turri, Enrico Duilio, 2024. "Monopsony in Growth Theory," CEPR Discussion Papers 19652, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP19652
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General
    • O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.