IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/19645.html

Three Reasons to Price Carbon Under Uncertainty: Accuracy of Simple Rules

Author

Listed:
  • van den Bremer, Ton
  • Hambel, Christoph
  • van der Ploeg, Frederick

Abstract

An easy-to-interpret rule for the optimal risk-adjusted social cost of carbon is derived using perturbation analysis. This rule internalises the adverse effects of global warming on the risk of recurring climate-related disasters and the risk of irreversible climate tipping points as well as the usual adverse effect on total factor productivity. It approximates the true numerical optimum well, especially if the small parameters (i.e., the share of damages in GDP, the sensitivity of the risk of disasters to temperature and the risk of climate tipping) are small enough and the discount rates corrected for growth and risk is not too small. The rule is also accurate if applied to models with a different supply side, e.g., with ongoing technical progress in fossil-fuel production or multiple economic sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • van den Bremer, Ton & Hambel, Christoph & van der Ploeg, Frederick, 2024. "Three Reasons to Price Carbon Under Uncertainty: Accuracy of Simple Rules," CEPR Discussion Papers 19645, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP19645
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.