IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/19603.html

The Chicago Plan Revisited - Debt-Free Money, Growth, and Stability

Author

Listed:
  • Kumhof, Michael

Abstract

The Chicago Plan, proposed by leading economists during the Great Depression, envisaged the separation of banks into money banks with 100% reserve backing for deposits and credit banks financed through non-monetary liabilities. Fisher (1936) claimed four advantages: (1) Reduction of public debt through a debt-to-equity swap. (2) Reduction of private debts as money creation no longer requires debt creation. (3) Elimination of runs on the payment system. (4) Better control of credit-driven business cycles. Using a DSGE model of the US economy, we find strong support for all four claims. Furthermore, steady state output gains approach 17 percent and monetary policy is much more effective in response to every shock. Monetary policy improves welfare by combining a conventional Taylor rule with a countercyclical rule for the interest rate on treasury loans to credit banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Kumhof, Michael, 2024. "The Chicago Plan Revisited - Debt-Free Money, Growth, and Stability," CEPR Discussion Papers 19603, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP19603
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E44 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
    • E52 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Monetary Policy
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.