IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/19472.html

What is Fair? Experimental Evidence on Fair Equality vs Fair Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Dwenger, Nadja
  • Sjursen, Ingrid Hoem
  • Vietz, Jasmin

Abstract

Many societies aim to design policies based on meritocratic fairness, which involves two principles: (i) paying individuals with equal performance equally (fair equality) and (ii) paying individuals with higher performance more (fair inequality). Yet, often it is impossible to respect both simultaneously. This paper provides novel evidence on the importance individuals attach to each principle from a large-scale experiment in the United States. We document large heterogeneity in preferences. Individuals incur substantial personal costs to implement their preferred principle. Republican supporters are more likely to prefer fair inequality. The findings offer insights into the political economy of redistribution and public policy design.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwenger, Nadja & Sjursen, Ingrid Hoem & Vietz, Jasmin, 2024. "What is Fair? Experimental Evidence on Fair Equality vs Fair Inequality," CEPR Discussion Papers 19472, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP19472
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:19472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.