IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/17934.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How important are user-generated data for search result quality? Experimental evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Klein, Tobias
  • Kurmangaliyeva, Madina
  • Prüfer, Jens
  • Prüfer, Patricia

Abstract

Do some search engines produce better search results because their algorithm is better, or because they have access to more data from past searches? We document that the algorithm of a small search engine can produce non-personalized results that are of similar quality to the dominant firm’s (Google), if it has enough data, and that overall differences in the quality of search results are explained by searches for rare queries. This is confirmed by results from an experiment, in which we keep the algorithm of the search engine fixed and only vary the amount of data it uses as an input. Because 74% of the traffic in our data come from rare queries, these are the pivotal dimension of competition, where a search engine must perform well to offer users high quality and gain market share. Our results suggest that a small search engine would be able to produce search results that are of similar quality as Google’s, if it had access to the data users generated by using Google in the past. We discuss why data sharing may increase innovation here.

Suggested Citation

  • Klein, Tobias & Kurmangaliyeva, Madina & Prüfer, Jens & Prüfer, Patricia, 2023. "How important are user-generated data for search result quality? Experimental evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 17934, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP17934
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.