IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/17745.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is Bitcoin a better safe-haven asset for individual investors than Gold? – Evidence from sanctioned Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Wolff, Christian
  • Zhang, Lu

Abstract

Extensive research on safe-haven assets has been conducted in the literature. An important finding is that safe-haven assets are frequently used by institutional investors, such as pension funds and investment banks, to ride out high volatility. However, the issue of whether individual investors can benefit from it during a financial crisis has not been adequately addressed. Using the case of sanctioned Russia, we attempt to study whether Bitcoin as a decentralized asset can play a more useful role than gold to protect individual investors when the majority of safe-haven assets are restricted from transactions. Our main results show that both assets exhibit intraday weak safe-haven properties against the ruble. However, gold saw a waning trend compared with its historical performance, whereas Bitcoin’s capability increased during this period. Further sentiment analysis demonstrates Russian investors’ positive attitudes regarding Bitcoin boosting its price in response to the ruble’s depreciation. The return on gold is more likely to be impacted by international investors who are concerned about global uncertainties

Suggested Citation

  • Wolff, Christian & Zhang, Lu, 2022. "Is Bitcoin a better safe-haven asset for individual investors than Gold? – Evidence from sanctioned Russia," CEPR Discussion Papers 17745, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP17745
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.