Author
Listed:
- Grüner, Hans Peter
- Rohde, Linnéa Marie
Abstract
Do people have a preference for making choices themselves, or do they prefer to choose a preselected alternative? If consumers value choice, recommender systems which facilitate choices might trigger consumers not to choose the recommendation - even when the other alternatives are less preferred. We conduct an incentivized survey experiment with a large sample from the German population, where participants choose between three lotteries. In the main treatment, participants make a choice between a preselected lottery and a two-element choice set, from which they then make an additional choice. We find that participants’ choices exhibit a bias towards the preselected alternative, and estimating a structural model reveals that the mean willingness to pay to make an additional choice is negative. Nevertheless, about 41% of the sample are estimated to have a positive value of choice. We show that measurable individual characteristics correlate with the preference for choice. Linking choices to the Big Five personality traits reveals that the preference for the preselected alternative increases in Openness. Moreover, we link participants’ preferences for choice to their political attitudes, showing that right-wing participants are more likely to prefer the preselected alternative than center-left participants.
Suggested Citation
Grüner, Hans Peter & Rohde, Linnéa Marie, 2022.
"The Value of Choice - Evidence from an Incentivized Survey Experiment,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
17425, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Handle:
RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17425
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.