IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/16340.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How do Shoppers Respond to Information on Price Changes in Multiple Product Categories? Evidence from a Field Experiment in On

Author

Listed:
  • Eliaz, Kfir
  • Weisburd, Sarit
  • Oren-Kolbinger, Orli

Abstract

Supermarket shopping typically entails repeated purchases of many items from multiple product categories, when the prices in each category are subject to frequent changes. Retailers often alert shoppers to price decreases through announcements of discounts. We analyze how shoppers respond to such information on discounts in multiple product categories using data from a field experiment on a website for online grocery shopping. We compare purchasing decisions made by shoppers who received (coarse) information on discounts, to shoppers who had access to these same discounts but did not receive any information on them. We find that only shoppers who purchased in a discounted food category prior to the experiment exhibit a significant response to the information. This response takes the form of an increase in purchases in the discounted category of items that shoppers had already purchased in the past, regardless of whether these items are currently on sale. Thus, during a sale, demand increases for both the discounted items and their more expensive substitutes within the discounted category. We show that this effect is driven by unbranded products, and it subsides when shoppers are provided with more detailed information on the discounted products.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliaz, Kfir & Weisburd, Sarit & Oren-Kolbinger, Orli, 2021. "How do Shoppers Respond to Information on Price Changes in Multiple Product Categories? Evidence from a Field Experiment in On," CEPR Discussion Papers 16340, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP16340
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.