IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/16286.html

Cash Transfers and the Local Economy: Evidence from Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Gerard, Francois
  • Naritomi, Joana
  • Silva, Joana

Abstract

Cash transfers have been adopted worldwide and credited with significant reductions in poverty. However, their economy-wide effects continue to spark heated debates, particularly due to potential adverse effects on the labor market. This paper studies the impact of a flagship government-run program – Bolsa Família in Brazil – on local economies in a context where such concerns are particularly strong, as eligibility is means-tested. We find that an expansion of the program positively affected local economic activity using variation in the size of the reform across municipalities. The results are consistent with cash transfers stimulating local demand, despite means testing. These economy-wide effects substantially increase the marginal value of public funds of the reform, raising it above the value of a non-distortionary transfer.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerard, Francois & Naritomi, Joana & Silva, Joana, 2021. "Cash Transfers and the Local Economy: Evidence from Brazil," CEPR Discussion Papers 16286, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP16286
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.