From Learning to Partnership. Multinational R&D Cooperation in Developing Countries
This paper is a first attempt to analyse the determinants of inter-firm R&D agreements between advanced and developing countries, i.e. between firms with asymmetric endowments of knowledge. It shows that international dispersion of R&D activity by multinationals also concerns developing countries, particularly the New Industrialized Countries (NICs). Indeed, both our theory and empirical evidence show that R&D can be carried out via arm’s-length agreements, even between partners with asymmetric endowments of knowledge. The paper develops a theoretical model which brings together some of the central assumptions of the literature on R&D cooperation and of the literature on hierarchical transfer of technology. A multinational has the option between setting up a subsidiary and competing with a local firm in a duopoly, or implementing an agreement and sharing monopoly profits. The two firms, if they choose the agreement option, may also cooperate in R&D. The model shows that R&D cooperation increases both the profitability and the stability of the agreement. The model also shows that R&D cooperation is more likely when asymmetries in R&D efficiency between the partners are not too large. Spillovers have an ambiguous role; they must be large enough to induce firms to form an arm’s-length agreement, but if they are too large they discourage R&D cooperation. The empirical analysis is based on a data set of international arm’s-length agreements. By testing a dichotomous choice model, it supports some of the key theoretical results and assumptions: R&D agreements are particularly likely to emerge when firms have a non-hierarchical relationship, in knowledge-intensive industries, and when technological asymmetries between home and host countries are not too large. Indeed, most R&D agreements are concentrated in the NICs which have relatively advanced industrial bases and capabilities.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
|Date of creation:||Mar 1997|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ.|
Phone: 44 - 20 - 7183 8801
Fax: 44 - 20 - 7183 8820
|Order Information:|| Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.