From Learning to Partnership. Multinational R&D Cooperation in Developing Countries
This paper is a first attempt to analyse the determinants of inter-firm R&D agreements between advanced and developing countries, i.e. between firms with asymmetric endowments of knowledge. It shows that international dispersion of R&D activity by multinationals also concerns developing countries, particularly the New Industrialized Countries (NICs). Indeed, both our theory and empirical evidence show that R&D can be carried out via arm’s-length agreements, even between partners with asymmetric endowments of knowledge. The paper develops a theoretical model which brings together some of the central assumptions of the literature on R&D cooperation and of the literature on hierarchical transfer of technology. A multinational has the option between setting up a subsidiary and competing with a local firm in a duopoly, or implementing an agreement and sharing monopoly profits. The two firms, if they choose the agreement option, may also cooperate in R&D. The model shows that R&D cooperation increases both the profitability and the stability of the agreement. The model also shows that R&D cooperation is more likely when asymmetries in R&D efficiency between the partners are not too large. Spillovers have an ambiguous role; they must be large enough to induce firms to form an arm’s-length agreement, but if they are too large they discourage R&D cooperation. The empirical analysis is based on a data set of international arm’s-length agreements. By testing a dichotomous choice model, it supports some of the key theoretical results and assumptions: R&D agreements are particularly likely to emerge when firms have a non-hierarchical relationship, in knowledge-intensive industries, and when technological asymmetries between home and host countries are not too large. Indeed, most R&D agreements are concentrated in the NICs which have relatively advanced industrial bases and capabilities.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
|Date of creation:||Mar 1997|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: 44 - 20 - 7183 8801
Fax: 44 - 20 - 7183 8820
|Order Information:|| Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.