IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Trade Law and Environmental Issues in Central and East European Countries

Listed author(s):
  • Rauscher, Michael

International trade and environmental regulation are interdependent. Central and East European Countries (CEECs) are now being integrated in international markets, and the question arises how environmental issues should be taken account of during this process and which institutional framework is appropriate. The first part of the paper reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on trade and the environment and shows that the empirical evidence of a close link between international trade and environmental issues is not particularly strong. Another section of the paper looks at the environmental policies of the CEECs and at their comparative advantages. The main part of the paper deals with trade law and institutions that are of major importance in the context of environmental disruptions and with environmental policy instruments and institutions that affect the patterns of trade and can be used for protectionist purposes. They are discussed in the context of the experience with existing international agreements. The major questions are: (i) how the capture of environmental regulation by protectionist interest groups can be avoided; (ii) under which circumstances the CEECs should adjust their environmental standards to West European levels; (iii) whether and when green barriers to trade should be used; (iv) what can be done to avoid harmful tax competition in the field of environmental regulation; and (v) how international disputes can be resolved.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Paper provided by C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number 1045.

in new window

Date of creation: Oct 1994
Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1045
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ.

Phone: 44 - 20 - 7183 8801
Fax: 44 - 20 - 7183 8820

Order Information: Email:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.