Second-best insurance contract design in an incomplete market
This paper considers the optimal form of insurance contracts for multiple risks. A well-known result in the literature is that, under fairly general conditions, an insurance policy with a deductible for aggregate losses is optimal. We provide a new proof of this result based only on stochastic dominance (whereas existing proofs require dynamic optimization techniques). Considering a real-world incompleteness, whereby separate loss exposures are indemnified via separate contracts, we show that separate deductibles are second-best optima in this setting. We compare the indemnity provided in this second-best setting with first-best solutions. The effect of second-best contracts on the individual's total insurance demand is also examined.
|Date of creation:||01 Feb 1992|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Voie du Roman Pays 34, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium)|
Fax: +32 10474304
Web page: http://www.uclouvain.be/core
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cor:louvco:1992012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alain GILLIS)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.