IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000482/012676.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Un análisis del trabajo decente como instrumento conceptual

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Carolina Córdoba Currea

Abstract

El trabajo decente es un objetivo de política económica y social de primera línea para los países firmantes de los Objetivos del Milenio (ODM) y los países miembros de la OECD. En este documento se presenta un balance conceptual de los enfoques de empleos atípicos, trabajos precarios, trabajos informales y empleos de mala calidad, que luego se comparan con el enfoque de trabajo decente. Finalmente se concluye que el trabajo decente permite tener ganancias conceptuales y analíticas para el estudio del mercado de trabajo en comparación con los enfoques ya mencionados. ****** Nowadays, decent work is a frontline objective of economic and social policies, especially for signatories of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and OECD countries. This paper presents a conceptual balance about atypical employment, precarious employment, informal employments and bad quality employments approaches, which are then compared with the decent work approach. Finally, It concludes that decent work approach offers conceptual and analytical gains for labor market analysis, compared to others approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Carolina Córdoba Currea, 2013. "Un análisis del trabajo decente como instrumento conceptual," Revista IB 12676, Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística - DANE.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000482:012676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.dane.gov.co/candane/images/Publicaciones/magazinv_2013/articulo_claudia_cordoba_2013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    trabajo decente; empleos atípicos; trabajos informales; trabajos precarios; calidad del empleo; calidad del trabajo e indicadores de Laeken.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000482:012676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daneeco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.