IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000176/022972.html

“Es” y “Deber ser” en las teorías de la decisión. Acerca de la condición normativa de la teoría de la decisión racional

Author

Listed:
  • Giancarlo Romano G

Abstract

The paper discusses the exposure of Santiago y Cante (2009) of the rational choice theory (RCT) and the expected utility model and controvert his claim according to which the Prospect Theory of Kahneman and Tversky threatens the normative status of the RCT. The paper explains what that status is and its conceptual and prescriptive justification. I also show some normative implications of the PT hardly to sustain and challenge that it can serve as a normative model alternative to RCT.

Suggested Citation

  • Giancarlo Romano G, 2012. "“Es” y “Deber ser” en las teorías de la decisión. Acerca de la condición normativa de la teoría de la decisión racional," Econógrafos, Escuela de Economía 022972, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000176:022972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fce.unal.edu.co/media/files/doc__economa_n_33__romano_o.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000176:022972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Facultad de Ciencias Económicas Unal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/funalco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.