IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000176/022963.html

Costo efectividad de las pruebas para estratificación del riesgo comparado con no hacerlas en el tratamiento de la leucemia mieloide aguda en población pediátrica

Author

Listed:
  • Mario García-Molina
  • Liliana Chicaíza-Becerra
  • Hoover Quitian-Reyes
  • Adriana Linares-Ballesteros
  • Oscar Ramírez Wuttemberger

Abstract

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of risk stratification tests vs. not doing them in pediatric population with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods: A decision tree model was built with life years gained as outcome, from the perspective of the health system, and including all direct costs. In the transplant arm we included the costs of risk-stratification tests for all the patients, (even those who are not consolidated with transplant, given the test results). Pharmaceutical prices were obtained from the System of Information of Medicaments SISMED (2008), and the value of procedures was calculated from the 2001 ISS tariff manual adding 30%. All monetary amounts were expressed in Colombian pesos of 2010. No discount was applied as costs are incurred in during the first year. The cost-effectiveness threshold per life year gained was three times the 2010 per capita GDP. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed. Results: When adding the cost of risk-stratification tests for all patients the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of transplantation was $$8.559.944, which is lower than the per capita GDP of 2010, $12.047.418. Hence, risk-stratification tests are cost effective. Results are robust to changes in the values of the model’s parameters. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis with ten thousand simulations showed that unrelated transplant has a 74% probability of being cost effective. Conclusions: In the Colombian health system, performing risk-stratification tests in AML pediatric patients is a cost-effective alternative.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario García-Molina & Liliana Chicaíza-Becerra & Hoover Quitian-Reyes & Adriana Linares-Ballesteros & Oscar Ramírez Wuttemberger, 2012. "Costo efectividad de las pruebas para estratificación del riesgo comparado con no hacerlas en el tratamiento de la leucemia mieloide aguda en población pediátrica," Econógrafos, Escuela de Economía 022963, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000176:022963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fce.unal.edu.co/media/files/doc_escuela_de_economia_n_42_garcia_et_al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000176:022963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Facultad de Ciencias Económicas Unal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/funalco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.