IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000092/011100.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A DSGE Model with loss aversion in consumption and leisure: An explanation for business cycles aymmetries

Author

Abstract

In this paper, an asymmetric DSGE model is built in order to account for asymmetries in business cycles. One of the most important contributions of this work is the construcion of a general utility function which nests loss aversion, risk aversion and habits formation, by means of a smooth transition function. The main idea behind this asymmetric utility funcion is that under a recession, the agents over-smooth consumption and leisure choices in order to avoid a huge departure of them from the reference level of the utility; while under a boom, the agents simply smooth consumption and leisure but trying to be as far as possible from the reference level of utility. The simulations of this model by means of Perturbations Method show that it is possible to reproduce asymmetrical business cycles where recession (on shock) are stronger than booms and booms are more long lasting than recession. One additional and unexpected result is a downward stickyness shown by real wages and as consequence of this, a more persistente fall in employment in recession than in boom. Thus the model reproduces not only asymmetrical business cycles but also real stickyness and hysteresis.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilman Gomez, 2014. "A DSGE Model with loss aversion in consumption and leisure: An explanation for business cycles aymmetries," Documentos de Trabajo 011100, Universidad del Rosario.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000092:011100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10336/10967/11100.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. Farmer & Cameron Hepburn & Penny Mealy & Alexander Teytelboym, 2015. "A Third Wave in the Economics of Climate Change," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(2), pages 329-357, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000092:011100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Facultad de Economía (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.