IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cns/cnscwp/202601.html

Financial Literacy, "Don't Know" Replies and Investor's Trading Behavior

Author

Abstract

The inclination to guess rather than to admit a lack of knowledge by responding "Don't know" can explain why investors fail the surveys intended to assess their financial competence. Using MiFID test answers and trading data, we investigate whether investors who admit their ignorance and select the "Don't know" answers trade less, a!ord lower transaction costs, and achieve better (net) returns than investors who prefer to guess and select the wrong answers. Additionally, we show that among investors who fill in the MiFID test multiple times, those who select the "Don't know" answers trade less, pay lower transaction costs and perform better than the guesser investors.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Tedde, 2026. "Financial Literacy, "Don't Know" Replies and Investor's Trading Behavior," Working Paper CRENoS 202601, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
  • Handle: RePEc:cns:cnscwp:202601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crenos.unica.it/bibcite/reference/6427
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://crenos.unica.it/sites/default/files/2026-04/wp-26-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cns:cnscwp:202601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRENoS The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask CRENoS to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crenoit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.