IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

General Equilibrium Benefit Estimates for Spatial Externalities: Projected Ozone Reductions for the Los Angeles Air Basin


  • V. Kerry Smith
  • Holger Sieg
  • H. Spencer Banzhaf
  • Randy Walsh


This paper demonstrates how a new framework, using the necessary conditions for a locational equilibrium, offers the potential to transform this policy landscape. We demonstrate in this paper that the framework can be used as part of a benefit analysis of current environmental policy alternatives. We use our earlier estimates of household preferences derived within a locational equilibrium framework for the Los Angeles area. These findings are combined together with the spatially delineated, air quality projections developed by EPA for the evaluation of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments reported in EPA's first Prospective Analysis. Our approach is capable of accommodating the levels of detail generated for this policy assessment. It uses the same projected spatial variation in ozone concentrations in the computation of general equilibrium price effects as was developed for the agency's benefit analysis. Our findings indicate that the estimated annual general equilibrium benefits in 2000 and 2010 associated with the ozone improvements due to continuing the policies mandated under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments will be dramatically different by income group and location within the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The gains range from $33 to about $2,400 per household (in 1990 dollars). These differences arise from variations in air quality conditions, income, and the effects of general equilibrium price adjustment. To date, existing methods have been unable to measure consistently all of these effects together.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Kerry Smith & Holger Sieg & H. Spencer Banzhaf & Randy Walsh, "undated". "General Equilibrium Benefit Estimates for Spatial Externalities: Projected Ozone Reductions for the Los Angeles Air Basin," GSIA Working Papers 2003-08, Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:cmu:gsiawp:417232337

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmu:gsiawp:417232337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Steve Spear). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.