Marital status and economic activity: interpreting spinsters, wives and widows in pre-census population listings
This paper addresses the confusions between marital and occupational status in female descriptors, arguing that in order to calculate female labour force participation rates, we have to be able to read sources like population listings and early censuses in a much more careful way than has been done to date. For example, 'spinster' was used as an occupational descriptor alongside its connotation of an unmarried woman until at least 1801; 'Mrs' implied business ownership, not marriage; the general lack of occupational descriptors for married women did not necessarily mean they were unemployed, rather that enumerators omitted wives' occupations by convention; and that 'widow' was used only irregularly in an as yet unidentified pattern. Occupations missing from population listings are identified by different means. The conclusions about how to read population listings also have implications for the interpretation of later census returns.
|Date of creation:||20 Jul 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.econsoc.hist.cam.ac.uk/|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmh:wpaper:07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amy Price)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.